Friday, August 06, 2010

Remembering the Storm

(This article originally appeared on, on August 5, 2005)

In the early morning hours of Aug. 4, 1995, on the heels of an incessant artillery and air bombardment, some 200,000 Croatian troops moved in to “liberate” Krajina, a stretch of mountains inhabited by Serbs who had rejected Croatia’s secession from Yugoslavia four years prior. Overrunning the token UN observation posts, the U.S.-trained Croatian army quickly overwhelmed localized Serb resistance. President Franjo Tudjman declared Aug. 5, the day Croat troops entered the Serb capital of Knin, a national holiday: “Homeland Thanksgiving Day.” By Aug. 7, the “Republic of Serb Krajina” was no longer in existence.

A grand celebration is scheduled for tomorrow in Knin. Prime Minister Ivo Sanader, the late Tudjman’s political heir, will no doubt give a rousing patriotic speech, glorifying Croatia’s “defenders from Serbian aggression.” Some mainstream media will report that the offensive resulted in civilian casualties, and that one high-ranking Croatian general, Ante Gotovina, is a fugitive from war crimes charges at the Hague Inquisition. And that will be the end of it. Dwelling on “Operation Storm” (Oluja) serves no purpose in the official narrative of the Balkans wars. Its victims are that narrative’s principal villains, so their suffering must be suppressed. The victors, on the other hand, are no longer useful to the Empire. “Storm” is something Washington would like to forget. Serbs and Croats don’t have that luxury.

Frustrated Dreams

The area of Krajina was for several centuries the borderland between the Hapsburg and Ottoman empires, a buffer zone that protected the inner Hapsburg lands from Turkish raids. It was populated largely by Orthodox Serbs, who had fled Ottoman persecution, and who became frontiersmen for the Hapsburgs in exchange for land and liberty. By the 19th century, the Ottoman Turks were in retreat; the new danger to the Hapsburg Empire was Slavic nationalism. Vienna turned on its frontiersmen, encouraging conflict between the Orthodox Serbs and the Catholic Croats, who became its staunchest supporters. Vienna’s Serbophobia eventually led Austria-Hungary into a fatal conflict that destroyed much of European civilization.

It also nurtured the hatred that would explode in 1941 as the vicious Ustasha genocide. These homegrown Croatian Nazis, led by Ante Pavelic, set out to destroy the “race of slaves” (A. Starcevic) with ruthless abandon, but ran out of time. Still, by 1945 they had killed anywhere between half a million and 750,000 Serbs.

With the end of communism in 1990, Franjo Tudjman and his Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) brought a revival of Pavelic’s symbols and vocabulary. Some of the top supporters of the HDZ were Ustasha émigrés. Tudjman himself expressed relief that his wife was “neither Serb nor Jewish.” Tudjman’s constitutional reform redefined the republic as a nation-state of Croats, with Serbs as an ethnic minority. When Tudjman’s government declared independence from the Yugoslav federation in 1991, most Serbs saw 1941 all over again. This – and not some imaginary “aggression” from Serbia – was the root of their “rebellion,” and the genesis of the Krajina Republic. After several months of bitter fighting, marked by massacres, ambushes, and the most vitriolic propaganda, the UN brokered an armistice. The so-called Vance Plan envisioned four “protected areas,” with a Serb majority, whose eventual status would be resolved through negotiations.

Over the next three years, Tudjman’s government feverishly prepared for war, training its troops on the battlefields of Bosnia and staging quick, limited offensives at the strategic edges of UN-protected areas (most infamous being the Medak Pocket attack in 1993). Although enjoying political, diplomatic, and even military support from Vienna and Berlin since 1991, it was only when it got Washington’s support that Zagreb was ready – and able – to strike. “Retired” American officers, working for government contractor MPRI, claimed to teach Croat officers “democracy” and “human rights.” The events of May and August 1995 would demonstrate MPRI’s definitions of both.

Junkyard Dogs

"Dick: We ‘hired’ these guys to be our junkyard dogs because we were desperate. We need to try to ‘control’ them. But it is no time to get squeamish about things."
To End a War,
Chapter 6

US envoy to the Balkans Richard Holbrooke thus described the note slipped to him by Ambassador Robert Frasure, during a meeting with Croatian officials in 1995. Holbrooke’s own account of how the U.S. officially condemned Croatian attacks even as he was meeting with Tudjman and telling him which cities to take, suggests he was hardly “squeamish” about using Croats to fight what he – and hundreds of advocacy journalists, lobbyists, and policymakers – had termed “Serb aggression.”

On May 1, 1995, Croatian troops tested both their readiness and the UN’s will by staging a lightning strike at an exposed Serb enclave of Western Slavonia. The operation was code-named Bljesak – “flash,” or perhaps more appropriately, “Blitz.” The clear violation of the armistice went unpunished. The stage was set for Oluja.

According to Serb documentation, the three-day offensive in August 1995 resulted in the expulsion of 220,000 people. Some 1,943 people have been listed as missing/presumed dead, including 1199 civilians, 523 women, and 12 children. The death toll would have been greater had the Serbs not fled en masse before the advancing Croat tanks; all who stayed behind were killed. The Croats, and their American sponsors, were definitely not squeamish.

Ten years later, Krajina is still a wasteland, with “scattered ghost villages strewn with shell-scarred houses overgrown with ivy and tall grass” (Reuters). Only a tenth of some 400,000 Serbs who lived in Croatia before it seceded have returned, only to face bureaucratic abuse and frequent physical violence. Tudjman made Pavelic’s dream to rid Croatia of Serbs a reality. It seems everything is in the choice of allies.

Unpleasant Comparisons

After obliterating Krajina, the conquering Croatian army moved into western Bosnia, aiding the Izetbegovic government to crush a dissident faction led by Fikret Abdic and assisting in the major Muslim offensive that “coincided” with NATO’s massive bombing of Bosnian Serbs. But after the Dayton Agreement was signed and peace imposed on Bosnia, Empire’s junkyard dogs discovered the supply of Milk Bones had run out. They had served their purpose.

Today’s Croatia is frustrated that its ambitions to enter the EU and NATO hinge upon the capture of Ante Gotovina, a general involved in Oluja who is universally considered a war hero, but whom the Hague Inquisition accuses of war crimes. Some of the truth about atrocities against the Serbs is slowly coming to light, but interestingly enough, only after the prominent personalities accused have fallen out of political grace. The Zagreb leadership snaps back at any hint that Oluja might have been anything but just, right, and noble. When Serbian president Boris Tadic called it an “organized crime” in a statement Monday, President Mesic replied it could hardly compare to Serb crimes such as Srebrenica.

But by all means, let’s compare. In both cases, a UN “safe area” was targeted by the attack. In Srebrenica, the UN at least tried to protect Muslim civilians; in Krajina, it did no such thing. Serbs evacuated Muslim noncombatants from Srebrenica; Serbs who did not flee Krajina were killed. Yet Srebrenica is somehow “genocide,” while Oluja is a victory worth a national holiday?!

Another reason the Empire prefers to keep Oluja out of sight and out of mind is the push to establish an independent, Albanian-dominated Kosovo. If Croatia’s conquest of Krajina was legitimate, because Krajina’s existence violated its sacrosanct administrative borders, then why did Serbia not have the right to uphold its borders when it came to Kosovo? If obliterating the Serb population did not disqualify Croatia from keeping Krajina and Slavonia, how can the exodus of less than half of Kosovo’s Albanians disqualify Serbia from keeping Kosovo? If the Serbs, a constituent Yugoslav nation, did not have the right to ethnic self-determination in Krajina and Bosnia, how can the Kosovo Albanians (an ethnic minority) have one?

The “Abramowitz Doctrine”

This apparent paradox was “explained” by Morton Abramowitz, the eminence grise of U.S. foreign policy, in an interview last summer: “there is no entirely rational answer … you seek perfect reasoning, which does not correspond to reality on the ground.” Logic does not apply to the Empire, because it creates its own reality; where have we heard that before?

The “reality” Abramowitz and his like-minded policymakers have sought to establish, by force, has been one in which, whatever the circumstances, Serbs are in the wrong. Apologists for the Empire dismiss this observable, verifiable fact as a “conspiracy theory” and claim the Serbs have a “victim complex,” even as their entire Balkans “reality” rests on the claim that everyone else has been victimized by the Serbs.

What “perfect reasoning” is involved in recognizing the simple fact that the centuries-old Serb community in Krajina is practically extinct, and that the Serb community in Kosovo – from which most of their ancestors came – is facing the same prospect? Where the Nazis failed, the American Empire has succeeded. Is that really something to be thankful for?


Anonymous said...

Where ever jihadist go and US foreign policy converge Morton Abramowitz is there.

As Sibel Edmonds noted he was one of the people instrumental in supporting and getting Washington to recognise Xinjing in China as East Turkmenistan.

Along with Zbignew Brezinski which I am sure it has nothing to do with is.

It is amazing how your friends at can’t see the bigger of what the Balkans wars were all about for western policy makers.
I think it was Justin Raimando that wrote in one of his articles the reason that US supported terrorism in the Balkans was a precursor for the occupation in Iraq yet this makes no sense and runs counter to US efforts there.

On the topic of Operation Storm you were dead right when you made the comparison to Georgia’s invasion of South Ossetia with even the same MPRI were training Georgian forces in sabotage techniques except they wanted to go a step further by ethnically cleansing the region to get a Russian military response then get Russian forces bogged down in guerrilla conflict like the Afghan trap 79 or the two Chechen wars.

Prior to the assault Georgia used the same tactics as the Croats attacking the border regions to provoke gunfire response.

Anonymous said...

I was hoping to get a responce.

This is a good resource of terrorist court case documents in the US some of which have relevence and connections to Bosnia including the Benevolence Fund which Atta and the other hijackers operated through since the Bosnian war including 9/11 in the US.

US v. Benevolence International Foundation, et al.

US v. Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al.

Aleks said...

There is a reasoning. The Serbs were too stubborn and ignored western dictates. From Tito's 'Manja Srbija, Veca Jugoslavia' to the west's 'Manja Srbija, Veca Europa'. It was considered that the Serbs could only be managed by chopping them up.

Divide and rule, as old as history.

Speaking of which, did you see the recent Catherine Ashton missive that a new super powerful OHR should be put into place and the RS serbs should effectively be forced to unite with the M-C Federation?

Not so long after, I read a piece by old OHR creep Gregorian pointing out that there was absolutely no political will for this in Europe. Delicious!

Gregorian: 'International Community Won't Confront Dodik'

The only real carrot the EU has to Serbia is joining the EU. If the Serbs instead take their time, then there is not much 'Europe' (that is the EU divided Europe) can do against them especially as Serbia's stability in the balkans is key to its neighbors, not to mention the EU's famous 'Balkans Stability Pact'. US relevance in the Balkans is only diminishing. After all, follow the $$$ (or EUR in this case).

Aleks said...

Sorry, forgot to add the link to the Baron von Ashton story. Here it is, from the Daily Telegraph, 27 July 2010:

Baroness Ashton moves to take control of Bosnia

The question arises that if Dodik/RS are sanctioned and they reply by mass boycott, will the new proposed plans by Brussels actually lead the RS declaring independence? Brussels would also require the silent cooperation with Belgrade for this to go through and it is difficult to see how Tadic could even comply...

Anonymous said...


They wouldn't have gone through all that effort just to subdue Serbia setting up an international drug, terrorism and organised crime.

It is obvious that it was set up as a means to attack Russia given the people involved, history, the connections to Chechnya, etc. You would have to be blind not to see it.

Suvorov said...

Is it just me, or this article doesn't appear on if you go on their homepage? I can only access it there by clicking the link above.

CubuCoko said...

Suvorov, it was originally published in 2005.

CubuCoko said...

@ jack: lots of interesting info there. I would recommend checking out Brendan O'Neill at Spiked, who has done a fair bit of research on the US-jihadist connection.

I've been asked (and asked myself) many times over the years, "Why Serbia?" There is no single answer, because different factions within the Imperial establishment have different motivations, but Russophobia (where the Serbs are seen as surrogate Russians) has certainly played a major role.

Suvorov said...

Oh, sorry, I didn't notice that in the heading.

CubuCoko said...

No problem. I keep reusing this text because nothing has changed in the intervening years.

Dejo said...

That's the difference between journalists and your ilk, Malic. A journalist, in this situation, would pray for war so they'd get a raise or promotion.

Anonymous said...

@Gray Falcon

It is pretty obvious that the Balkans conflict was set up as a transit and training point/base connecting Jihadists in Europe and the Middle East terrorist and organised crime network to channel resources for war in the North Caucasus primarily through Chechnya just like in WW2 with Operation Blue

The evidence of this is overwhelming given the fact that all the senior foreign commanders fighting in Chechnya are former commanders during the Bosnian war, the same people and organisations involved in Bosnia are also involved Chechnya and the North Caucasus lead by NED and Soros with the same propaganda and fictitious numbers like the every changing death toll that exactly matches those given during the Balkans wars.
Every major terrorist attack since the 98 African Embassy bombings had a Chechen or Bosnian-Chechen connection 9/11 and Madrid being the best examples.

Brzezinski outright wrote in his 97 book The Grand Chessboard that Islamic militant movements advance US geo-political agenda in Eurasia and Eurasia is the US number 1 priority hence Obama/Brzezinskis Afghan “surge” and US real objective in Afghanistan.

The fact the he and his family clan have been in senior positions driving NATO and US foreign policy against Russia from BAC to ACPC, Azeri chamber of Commerce, etc and overseeing Ukraine’s post Soviet independence and coloured revolutions retty puts everything since 89 in context.

You would have to be blind not to see it.

Sibel Edmonds referenced the fact that US is using Jihadists to counter Russian and Chinese influence in Central Asia putting natural resources under US control.,-Madrassas,-HeroinTerrorism

About last year this time I posted articles with strong circumstantial evidence on RT blog and elsewhere that the Beslan massacre was organised and rehearsed in Bosnia with a jihadist video training in hostage taking in a school with an accompanying video which was used by the previously cited Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation operating under the new name of VAZIR which US hand prior knowledge of with documents seized from militants in Iraq.

I was hoping they would at least investigate it just to dismiss it.

Suvorov said...

Yes, I wish that mistake were harder to make.